If you have ever wondered why some employees are suing their employers over Work Uniforms, then read on. Work Uniforms are often a big benefit for employers. But what are the risks of wearing them? They are a form of sex discrimination and violate worker safety laws. Let’s take a closer look. Let’s examine how Work Uniforms affect workers. And why they’re such a hot topic.
Work Uniforms are a benefit to the employer
Employers and employees alike benefit from wearing uniforms. When employees are dressed in branded workwear, customers perceive them to be more professional and dedicated to their jobs. Additionally, customers tend to trust companies that employ uniformed employees. In addition to fostering professionalism, a work uniform can help employers cut down on staff time and laundry costs. So, why are work uniforms a good thing? Find out more below.
When worn by employees, uniforms help prevent cross-contamination, which is an issue in industries that deal with food safety. For instance, certain uniforms eliminate static electricity, reducing the risk of damaging sensitive electronic components. Similarly, work uniforms with a designated color can help employees to be identified quickly and easily. Lastly, uniforms can boost morale and customer service by transforming employees into brand ambassadors.
They are a form of sex discrimination
While many employers have policies against sexually revealing attire, this policy does not always constitute sex discrimination. This issue can be complicated and can involve multiple layers of discrimination. The EEOC has previously found that this type of policy may be a form of sex discrimination. To prove that you are being treated differently than men in your workplace, you must have the same standard for sex, not just different hairstyles and haircuts.
The R company requires its male employees to wear neckties to work while female employees must wear skirts or dresses. CP was suspended for wearing pants to work and alleges that this was a form of sex discrimination. Walmart also has a policy of laundering the uniforms, but the company won’t launder a female employee’s pants. However, it won’t accept this case unless Walmart voluntarily launders them.
They violate employee safety laws
Employers can be sued for not complying with their employees’ dress codes, as long as the company uniforms meet certain requirements. Uniform laws require employers to provide workers with suitable clothing for the job, but the federal government encourages employers to reimburse their employees for the cost of uniforms. For example, an employer cannot force female employees to wear provocative clothing, as it may create a hostile work environment. Nor can an employer prevent women from wearing religious head coverings. Equal employment laws also prohibit employers from discriminating against their employees’ natural hairstyles.
The Departments of Labor and Justice, the EEOC, and the Office of Personnel Management issued these laws. The cases have drawn similar results. The most recent court case centered on the Department of Labor’s UGESP. However, some cases involve lawsuits based on state or local laws. Work uniform lawsuits are often filed when an employer fails to provide employees with a protective outfit. Fortunately, this is a rare case where an employer can successfully sue for violating the FLSA.