If you suffered from metallosis or other side effects after your Durom Cup hip socket implant, you may have grounds for a claim against Zimmer. Read on to learn about what you can do to pursue a lawsuit against Zimmer. It may be possible to recover damages for your Durom Cup hip socket implant and other defective medical devices. You may also be eligible to receive a contingency fee from a lawyer.
Metallosis
Approximately six months after the Durom Cup was introduced into the market, a medical journal published a study of 165 patients who had suffered from metallosis. The study suggested that the hip replacements were not as effective as the manufacturer had hoped. Ultimately, it was the doctors and not the device that caused the problems. While Zimmer halted production of the Durom Cup, the company decided not to recall the product and instead focused on the safety of the product.
The Zimmer Durom Cup was a hip implant that contained a metal-on-metal component that prompted microscopic metal shavings to be released into the body. This triggered metallosis, an inflammatory reaction to elevated levels of metal in the body. Unfortunately, the Durom Cup failed prematurely, forcing many patients to undergo painful revision surgeries. Several Zimmer Durom Cup lawsuits were filed and settled with favorable settlement terms. The firm continues to represent patients who have suffered the effects of this hip implant.
Design defect
In July 2008, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. voluntarily recalled its Durom Cup Hip Socket Implant following thousands of patient complaints. The company’s investigation determined that the surgical parts were defective and that surgeons were not adequately trained to install the product. Many patients are still experiencing problems caused by these defective hip implants. There are many legal remedies for such issues. To find out if you qualify to file a Zimmer Durom Cup Hip Socket Implant lawsuit, complete the online form.
The Durom Cup is a metal device that was supposed to fuse the hip socket and artificial hip replacement surface without a traditional surgical procedure. Several patients have filed lawsuits against Zimmer Holdings over their failure to incorporate the Durom Cup, a result of faulty design and manufacturing. A defective design may have resulted in infection, loosening, and metal poisoning. Hundreds of patients may need revision hip surgery to correct the problem.
Side effects
While Zimmer has developed several types of hip replacement devices, the company’s newest product is known as the Durom Cup. Designed to last longer and provide patients with more range of motion, the Durom Cup is not cemented into place like other hip replacement devices. It can eventually loosen from the hip, causing pain that ranges from moderate to severe. Patients who had the Zimmer Durom Cup hip socket implant report that the pain they experience is similar to the level they experienced before the surgery.
The company recalled the Durom Cup temporarily in July 2008 but initially blamed the problems on the surgeons implanting the devices. In fact, many orthopedists had reported a defect in the Durom Cup. Within a few years, the cups would loosen. The company was also accused of misleading surgeons by advertising this product and failing to follow their own surgical instructions. Aside from a few reported side effects, the Durom Cup has also been linked to a number of other problems with implantability.
Contingency fee
In 2006, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. introduced the Zimmer Durom Cup hip socket implant, which may be defective or lead to early failure. Since then, a number of lawsuits have surfaced over this device, which is now recalled by the manufacturer. Several other hip socket implant lawsuits have been filed against Zimmer, including those involving the M/L Taper hip prosthesis and the Versys Femoral head. As of October 2018, 113 cases have been filed against Zimmer, and these are all being consolidated into one mass litigation case.
A lawyer who handles the Zimmer hip socket implant lawsuit will work on a contingency fee basis. This means that he accepts a fixed percentage of the lawsuit reward, and doesn’t get paid unless he wins. This type of arrangement works well for those who are seeking compensation after a Zimmer hip replacement. Lawyers will work closely with their clients, who are often individuals who have suffered complications as a result of their defective hip replacement.